Enforcement has been applied. To avoid responsibility, after I won the case he took his small furnit

Non-necessities can be executed, so furniture can theoretically be executed as well. However, the act of moving furniture is too primitive and barbaric, and the image is not good, so now they try not to use this method, unless the furniture is of high value, otherwise the court is too lazy to enforce the bargain. >>>More

Restaurant monitoring is not mandatory, many restaurants due to the need for management or store security and anti-theft reasons, their own remote monitoring, management role, Uroke to do store visual management, not only for anti-theft supervision, mainly to help stores do store visual analysis and management.

Hello, the introduction of the case is not very clear, it is best to add it clearly before giving targeted answers. If you are the applicant for enforcement, since you have applied to the court for compulsory enforcement, the court must handle it according to the legal procedures, of course, the applicant and the respondent can settle the settlement. If you are the person subject to enforcement, and the furniture and appliances have been forcibly seized by the court, you cannot move away without authorization, of course, the court cannot seize and enforce the furniture and appliances used in daily life.

Hiding is not the best way, there are fifteen miles on the first day of junior high school, right, so it is the best way to face the reality correctly and actively negotiate with the other party about the payment.

After the divorce, if there is any doubt or dispute about the property, they can file a lawsuit with the court to request a new division. If the ownership of the property has been determined and one party refuses to cooperate, it may apply to the court for compulsory enforcement. Any private coercive act is suspected of being a crime, and the other party can choose to report it to the police. >>>More