Is it reasonable for the main toilet to break down and the head of the household to ask the upstairs

Updated on Toilets 2024-07-19
2 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Not absolutely reasonable. It should be the first or second floor with the least cost, followed by the third floor, the fourth floor again, and so on.

  2. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    First of all, whether the pipe has passed the warranty period, and the developer will carry out maintenance and construction during the warranty period.

    If the warranty period is exceeded, the basic principle of "who uses and who repairs" should be followed, and all maintenance costs should be borne by the upstairs. There are many similar cases in China, and landlords can consult local lawyers to protect their rights and interests.

Related questions
1 answers2024-07-19

Climate: arid, with a temperate continental climate. Causes: Far from the sea, controlled by continental air masses all year round, the humid air currents over the sea are difficult to reach, and the obstruction of mountain ranges forms this climate. >>>More

2 answers2024-07-19

The main tube is in front, and the kitchen is irrelevant.

4 answers2024-07-19

1. All can be yes. But this is also too disgusting, since the kitchen has been changed to a toilet, then their toilet is not going to be changed to a kitchen, and now the housing structure is unified, so their kitchen is a toilet up and down? The habits of the children at home have not changed for a while, and they may pull something in the kitchen at night

3 answers2024-07-19

This is a force majeure, the landlord is not at fault, there is no need to bear the liability for compensation, and you do not need to bear the liability for the tile. Each pays the bill.

1 answers2024-07-19

Generally not, going to the toilet is peeing, coming out of the urethra, and the hymen is in the vagina.