The train toilet door caught in someone s hand, asking about compensation and liability

Updated on Toilets 2024-09-15
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The amount of compensation depends on the specific injury, including medical expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, nursing expenses, nutrition expenses, etc., and the disability compensation is also based on the level of disability, and the specific amount depends on the location, grade and age.

    If you solve it yourself, the conductor should not interfere, but if it is their door problem, the train unit will also compensate accordingly, but he has no legal basis for helping the other party. You can come to an agreement.

    If there are any other situations, you can send me a message directly, but give me extra points.

  2. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Legally, it seems that there is more than just the train conductor's business.

  3. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    All responsible, pay half each!

Related questions
3 answers2024-09-15

The conductor insisted on interfering because he was afraid that you would not understand the relevant procedures of the law, out of good intentions, and for fear that there would be discord between the two of you during the negotiation, which would cause the procedure to not proceed as usual, and that something unpleasant or undesirable would happen; The old lady and her daughter asked for 2,000 yuan, and the conductor said it was 3,000, and then said what the handling procedures were, to appease both parties and the like, the reason why there was a difference of 1,000 yuan was because the conductor also took into account the spiritual pension, so he said 1,000 yuan more, in fact, 2,000 and 3,000 are not much different, money is not a problem, right? The key is whether this matter is handled in the kind that both sides want to see - a peaceful settlement, after all, both sides are at fault in this matter, and you are at fault for "going to the toilet late at night, not paying attention when closing the door, and accidentally clipped the hand of an 85-year-old lady." The old lady was at fault for not paying attention to finding out whether there was anyone in the toilet when she got to the toilet, that is, she did not find out the true situation of the toilet in time, and she was injured (the injury was a comminuted fracture), which was also an unintentional mistake, since the old lady's attitude was very good, she also admitted that she was responsible. >>>More

5 answers2024-09-15

Your friend is responsible, it is best to go to the hospital for an examination at that time, check clearly, it is indeed nothing, and then negotiate with him how much to accompany or what miscellaneous expenses, and there will be nothing to do in the future. That's for the best. I'm just afraid that there will be sequelae. >>>More

11 answers2024-09-15

are all responsible, he didn't say it in advance, it is possible to drop or break, this is his fault, although he said, but after all, you broke someone else's things, and you should compensate for the loss.

13 answers2024-09-15

In your case, fault compensation applies;

1. Your friend is at fault, which is negligent and negligent, so you should confirm it before closing the door and remind others; >>>More