The kitchen urgently needs a sink, which brand is better?

Updated on Kitchen 2024-08-21
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    As an ordinary person, of course, the choice of things must be of good economic quality, so in terms of a consumer's experience after use, it is still a cost-effective Gaode stainless steel sink, and there has been no problem at home for two years.

  2. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Jiumu, Yajie is definitely a good thing, and it is not recommended to have more general brands, and you can find them yourself.

  3. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Caldecott's good, Taobao Caldecott's flagship store, the 304 stainless steel sink ten-piece set of 475 yuan for the New Year's special sale at a loss, is worth it!

  4. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Cost-effective - Daxin.

  5. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The sink is fine, and the sewer pipe and funnel have to be in order.

Related questions
2 answers2024-08-21

I feel that Huayi bathroom is OK, and the hardware is more senior, such as Ou Lin, such as Huayi.

2 answers2024-08-21

1. Flekka

It is a modern science and technology enterprise integrating R&D, manufacturing and sales of kitchen appliances, and has won a number of national industry patents, Suzhou Fleka Electrical Appliance Technology Development Co., Ltd. >>>More

2 answers2024-08-21

Good water purifier brands include American Eco, 3M, these two are very good water purifier brands, the United States has water purifier testing standards, and China does not, so it is recommended to choose imported brands! After testing, it is still a little more secure!

1 answers2024-08-21

I learned about the top ten brands of sensor faucets in the top ten brands of buying and buying online to see Chaoyang, Sheehan, Gauss, Kang Liyuan, Huayi. Of course, there are five other ones, I don't remember them all, you can see for yourself. >>>More

3 answers2024-08-21

The brand of Regal, when I visited the Meilunmei Warehouse Furniture Center, saw that a set of bedroom pure solid wood furniture was less than 50,000.