-
Anonymous users2024-01-24This should be something that is not in the contract, and it is generally decided by negotiation.
The result of the negotiation can be renewed. The original clause no longer works.
For example, if you tell them that because the house has poor security performance and you are afraid of further damage, you have to move out, and they should not bind you according to the requirements of the contract. Because the contractual requirements were laid down under the old situation.
It's like an ancient remand retrial.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-23It is unlikely that the rent will be refunded unless there is an agreement at the time of renting.
It is reasonable and the responsibility of the host to ask the host to improve the precautions.
If the loss is caused by the landlord's fault, it can be used as a reason for termination, but this should be reflected in the contract.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-22If you can't retreat first, you have to ask for improvement, and if you can't improve, it's OK to retreat.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-21It is not the landlord's obligation to take responsibility for yourself.
I think it's more difficult for the landlord to sue you for holding you accountable. First of all, did you call the police after the washing machine was lost? If you call the police, then the fact of the existence of the washing machine must be admitted, because the landlord can collect such evidence if he knows, then you can only claim that you have fulfilled the obligation of proper storage, and the thief burglary at night is not your fault that is difficult for you to prevent, unless the landlord proves that you are at fault, such as leaving the door open, etc., you should be exempt from liability; If you don't call the police, then you can not admit the fact of the existence of the washing machine, because the contract does not say, you have to see who is the person who proves the existence of the washing machine, if it is his friend, he has an interest, the proof is insufficient, the light person certificate is not good, you can not admit that there is a washing machine.
In this theft incident, the existence of the security door played a relatively large role, the installation of the security door was not stolen, and the one that was not installed was stolen. And it has been pointed out in advance that the anti-theft door should be installed, that is, the hidden danger of insecurity, but the landlord does not install it, that is, he has not fulfilled his obligations, can he claim compensation from this point? >>>More
People who have pets are extremely concerned about pets, and this mentality is not easy to understand for people who don't have pets. But it also depends on whether he is reasonable and whether he can empathize. >>>More
The landlord has no right to enter the contract until the contract ends
It depends on the specific situation, first of all, this lock must be problematic, secondly, the power outage can not be locked out of the tenant and whether the tenant is aware, if the tenant is aware and does not notify the tenant, cut out the tenant is not aware of the situation, the tenant is not responsible, if the tenant is notified, the tenant does not act that is the responsibility of the tenant, there are many situations to be specifically analyzed to determine the responsibility, as the tenant does not pay the rent must be wrong, it is best to negotiate to solve, If you can't solve it through negotiation, you can only go to the court to sue and solve it!!