-
Anonymous users2024-01-23In this theft incident, the existence of the security door played a relatively large role, the installation of the security door was not stolen, and the one that was not installed was stolen. And it has been pointed out in advance that the anti-theft door should be installed, that is, the hidden danger of insecurity, but the landlord does not install it, that is, he has not fulfilled his obligations, can he claim compensation from this point?
If there is an agreement in the contract, it may be considered to hold it liable.
It's just that there is no agreement in the contract. At that time, I didn't have enough awareness of safety, and I didn't pursue it further when I saw that he didn't pretend. Is there no way to take the landlord in this situation?
It is unlikely that compensation will be awarded.
According to the General Principles of the Civil Law, can it be required to bear the responsibility that is appropriate to its fault? How to fight this lawsuit?
It's an advertising word, and if you really ask him for compensation, it may mean something.
I can tell you solemnly: no responsibility! To tell a joke, if you are responsible, if the house is stolen, you will go to sell the security door, then he will not know the door that he will not pay? >>>More
Dream about an security door being replaced by a wooden door by a landlord: there will be people around you who want to get to know you better! If it's on. >>>More
You've met a lockpick.
Use the same trademark. Panpan security door should be registered in the province, or the national security door in the category of trademark. And it doesn't have a food program. >>>More