When drinking tea in a restaurant, the tea set was broken, and the people in the store had to pay fo

1. The teahouse owner should provide evidence to prove the fact of your infringement.

2. The boss proposes that you broke the tea set, that is, he proposes that you have violated his ownership of the tea set. The request should be supported by evidence from the boss.

3. If the boss cannot provide sufficient evidence to prove that you are infringing, then you do not need to compensate.

Fourth, if the boss sues the court in this case, it will be very unfavorable to you. The boss will ask for a transfer of possession of the tea set, and you do not raise an objection that the tea set is broken. The fact of whether or not to raise an objection must be proved by you.

The tea set was broken, which led to the birth of the cup.

It is difficult for both parties to make a judgment without actual proof, unless they can produce substantial evidence to prove it, and it depends on the amount of interest involved, and settlement is generally recommended in such cases.

There was not much money, the victim handled it well, there was no need to make a big move, and he did not suffer much loss or mental harm because of this matter. I just feel unbalanced. From a legal point of view, there must be a third or fourth party present.

There will be no evidence, if you check it, there will be a result. Whoever breaks is who breaks. If the truth is that you really didn't break it, then of course don't lose!

Truth is truth. But from my point of view, I think you don't want to cause trouble, and you don't even know if you broke it yourself! So...

But the outcome is still more satisfying to yourself, isn't it?

There are so many things that the more the law is resolved, the worse it gets! So my key point is not to rely on the law for everything, and the laws in China are not so in place!