Debate on how to refute the master to lead the door to practice in the individual

Updated on Enter the door 2024-04-05
1 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    This is the right reason, you still argue is a strong argument, the truth can not be argued, for a long time like this, it will slowly distort your psychology, and the final result hurts yourself, now people don't understand, think it doesn't matter, there will be a lot of perverted people, be cautious.

Related questions
17 answers2024-04-05

That is, the master only gives you directions (guides you), but the road must be your own way, and it depends on you how you go

6 answers2024-04-05

Master has taught us unreservedly, so whether we can do it depends on our own efforts.

1 answers2024-04-05

It means that the master will guide you in the correct way to practice, and you still have to rely on yourself to work hard. >>>More

6 answers2024-04-05

It is that being a master can only give you the direction and method to move forward, and whether you can succeed or not still needs your own dedication and efforts

12 answers2024-04-05

It means that the master only plays a guiding role, and the study and improvement of academic or technical skills must rely on the efforts of the students themselves. Master: A person who preaches and teaches his profession. Practice: Enterprising and growing in studies and skills. >>>More