Which is better, toilet or squat

Updated on Toilet 2024-04-13
17 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    The toilet is not easy to have hemorrhoids on the intestines, but you can use the toilet for your own use, and the guests may be a little unaccustomed to it, and they will stand on it to use, which is inconvenient, so it is good for guests to use the squatting type.

  2. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The toilet is generally used by your own family, and the squatting pit is generally used by guests.

  3. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    The toilet is more comfortable to use, and the squatting pit is healthier and helps to defecate.

  4. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    When decorating the bathroom, many people don't know whether it is better to install a toilet or a squatting pit? Which one is better? PChouse will take you to find out.

    Whether the toilet is better or the squatting pit depends on the actual situation. If the family is full of elderly and children, then it is naturally better to use a local toilet.

    However, from the perspective of use, the anorectal angle of the squatting position is about 10-30° worse than that of the sitting position, which can reduce abdominal strain and help with bowel movements. Therefore, squatting pits are more conducive to defecation than toilets, and are more suitable for people with constipation and other constipation difficulties. We also have a very simple cleaning of the squatting toilet and it is not as troublesome as the toilet.

    The toilet needs to waste a lot of water when flushing, but if you use a squatting toilet, you only need a little water, which can also save a lot of water resources, so Li Pei This is a big advantage of squatting toilets.

  5. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The supporting facilities of each kind of sanitary ware are different, can not be compared, the family use is recommended or the toilet is appropriate, the installation size of the two kinds of sanitary ware is different, the reserved drain pipe caliber position is different, it is not easy to change, the design of the building is generally a toilet,

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Of course, the toilet is good for your own home, and there are old people who can't squat! I feel good squatting in public places, but foreign countries, whether it is a family or a public place, are toilets, and they were invented in China.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Disadvantages of toilets: unhygienic, not suitable for public use, easy to transmit diseases, skin diseases and other advantages: beautiful, will not have too much taste.

    The disadvantages of squatting pits: the taste is to the point, and it is not easy to clean.

    Advantages: It is relatively safe compared to toilets and is not easy to spread diseases.

    If you use it at home, you can consider using a toilet, but if you use it at a public property, try not to use it. It's best to be on your own.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    1. For young people, choosing a squatting toilet is more hygienic than a toilet. Because there are more bacteria around the toilet, if the toilet is not clean after your buttocks are in close contact with the toilet, it will lead to bacterial infection of girls, and even cause gynecological diseases, while the skin of the squatting toilet is not in direct contact. Therefore, it is recommended that young people try to choose squatting toilets to be more hygienic.

    2. Secondly, from the perspective of the user group, for the elderly, pregnant women or people with poor physical strength at home, try to use the toilet at home. Because it is generally said that the elderly are more likely to be deficient in calcium, the strength of the legs will become weaker, and once the squat for a long time will lead to temporary ischemia in the brain. So from the point of view of safety, choosing a toilet is the most suitable choice.

    3. Then from a health point of view, for normal people, squatting can keep the muscles around the muscles tight and the blood supply abundant, while sitting in the toilet for a long time will relax the muscles and cause health problems of prolapse and hemorrhoids.

    Finally, from the perspective of the product itself, the price of the squatting toilet is lower than that of the toilet, and the service life of the two is also quite different. There will be no problem with the squatting toilet itself, basically do not replace it, at most, the flushometer will have problems after being used for a long time. The toilet is more likely to clog, and the service life is generally about 10 years before it needs to be replaced.

    However, different products give people different sense of service.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Is it better to have a toilet or a squatting pit in the bathroom? After listening to the comparison of experts, I realized that too many people were wrong.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    It depends.

    1. For young people, choosing a squatting toilet is more hygienic than a toilet. Because there are more bacteria around the toilet, if the toilet is not clean after your buttocks are in close contact with the toilet, it will lead to bacterial infection of girls, and even cause gynecological diseases, while the skin of the squatting toilet is not in direct contact. Therefore, it is recommended that young people try to choose squatting toilets to be more hygienic.

    2. Secondly, from the perspective of the user group, for the elderly, pregnant women or people with poor physical strength at home, try to use the toilet at home. Because it is generally said that the elderly are more likely to be deficient in calcium, the strength of the legs will become weaker, and once the squat for a long time will lead to temporary ischemia in the brain. So from the point of view of safety, choosing a toilet is the most suitable choice.

    3. Then from a health point of view, for normal people, squatting can keep the muscles around the muscles tight and the blood supply abundant, while sitting in the toilet for a long time will relax the muscles and cause health problems of prolapse and hemorrhoids.

    Finally, from the perspective of the product itself, the price of the squatting toilet is lower than that of the toilet, and the service life of the two is also quite different. There will be no problem with the squatting toilet itself, basically do not replace it, at most, the flushometer will have problems after being used for a long time. The toilet is more likely to clog, and the service life is generally about 10 years before it needs to be replaced.

    However, different products give people different sense of service.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Whether the toilet is better or the squatting pit depends on the actual situation. If the family is full of elderly and children, then it is naturally better to use the toilet.

    However, from the perspective of use, the anorectal angle of the squatting position is about 10-30° worse than that of the sitting position, which can reduce abdominal strain and help with bowel movements. Therefore, squatting pits are more conducive to defecation than toilets, and are more suitable for people with constipation and other constipation difficulties. We also have a very simple cleaning of the squatting toilet and it is not as troublesome as the toilet.

    The toilet needs to waste a lot of water when flushing, but if you use a squatting toilet, you only need a little water, which can also save a lot of water, so this is a big advantage of squatting toilets.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    In fact, according to the comparison of all aspects, the squatting toilet is better than the toilet. It's just that in modern families, many toilets have become the general trend, and it is rare to really consider which one is more ergonomic.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    They are used in different scenarios, toilets are used more for personal homes, and squatting pits are generally used in public places.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    It varies from person to person, and it is best for the elderly to use the toilet, because it is easy to get up suddenly after using the squatting pit for a long time.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    Both have their own advantages, it depends on who uses them, if it is an elderly person, of course, it is better to use the toilet, it will be comfortable to sit on it, and young people are different.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Squatting pits. Squatting is easier to exert force. It's easier to pull out. The time is short. If the time is short, it is not easy to get hemorrhoids.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    The comparison of toilet and squat pit is as follows:

    >1. Consider the needs of the population: the toilet is more suitable for the elderly or frail people, because the legs support all the weight of the human body, if you squat for a long time and then stand, it is easy to cause cerebral ischemia, for the elderly, the infirm or pregnant women, the situation will be more serious, so it is best to use the toilet.

    2. From the perspective of hygiene: the toilet needs a large area to contact the skin, if the cleaning and hygiene are not in place, the buttocks are likely to be infected, so it will be more hygienic to choose a squatting toilet.

    3. Consider the appearance of the toilet: the appearance of the toilet is fashionable and beautiful, and there are a variety of styles that can be matched.

    4. From the cost performance consideration: the price of the toilet is generally higher than that of the squatting toilet, and the service life is shorter than the squatting pit, the water tank is one of the places that are most prone to problems, and there are many possibilities that cause the toilet to be blocked. Squatting toilets, on the other hand, are simpler, inexpensive, and less problematic.

    Toilet

    The toilet is also called a toilet.

    It is a bucket with the lid for urination and defecation. The history of the toilet can be traced back to the Han Dynasty, when the toilet was called Huzi, which was dedicated to the emperor, and legend has it that it was made of jade. It was held by eunuchs who served the emperor at any time.

    Later, in the Tang Dynasty, in order to avoid secrecy, the tiger was renamed as a beast or a horse. After that, it evolved into the name of the toilet.

    When choosing a toilet, the color should match the overall color of the washbasin and bathroom. In addition, the pit distance must be measured accurately, and the error cannot exceed 1 cm, otherwise it will not be installed.

Related questions
2 answers2024-04-13

The supporting facilities of each kind of sanitary ware are different, can not be compared, the family use is recommended or the toilet is appropriate, the installation size of the two kinds of sanitary ware is different, the reserved drain pipe caliber position is different, it is not easy to change, the design of the building is generally a toilet,

1 answers2024-04-13

Does this need to be asked? Of course, sitting is more labor-saving and comfortable than squatting, especially for the elderly, who are easy to faint and fall when they stand up after squatting for a long time. There are many advantages to installing a toilet than a squatting toilet, I don't believe you can squat for 10 minutes, and then sit on a chair for 10 minutes to see how it feels.

1 answers2024-04-13

It depends.

1. For young people, choosing a squatting toilet is more hygienic than a toilet. Because there are more bacteria around the toilet, if the toilet is not clean after your buttocks are in close contact with the toilet, it will lead to bacterial infection of girls, and even cause gynecological diseases, while the skin of the squatting toilet is not in direct contact. Therefore, it is recommended that young people try to choose squatting toilets to be more hygienic. >>>More

1 answers2024-04-13

Toilets are generally chosen for home use, and there are generally one or two toilets for the disabled in public areas

9 answers2024-04-13

Squatting pits are easy to return to smell, or the toilet has a higher comprehensive score.