The train toilet is directly discharged, and in order to protect the environment, I use the followin

Updated on Toilets 2024-09-09
1 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Irrationality!

    Because the poop will be mixed with the garbage, and the garbage in the garbage bin on the train is not sorted, when it is re-sorted, it may contaminate the recyclable garbage, thus causing greater secondary pollution.

    Unless you arrange a dedicated bin for poop.

    So your idea doesn't work.

Related questions
5 answers2024-09-09

It feels like the train that is discharged directly to land is more polluting to the environment. >>>More

1 answers2024-09-09

Due to the high speed of the trains, the sewage and excrement are generally atomized when discharged, and are discharged on the ballast on both sides of the tracks, sleepers, and the shoulders under the tracks.

1 answers2024-09-09

Basically, since the 25G type bus, the toilet has been used, and the in-line toilet is no longer used, which not only saves water but is also conducive to environmental hygiene. Please refer to the details and introduction.

3 answers2024-09-09

I think the train, there are crowds of people in the place where the train passes, and if it can't be decomposed in time, it will cause pollution, and the sea will be decomposed without causing pollution, and the sea is big.

9 answers2024-09-09

If you go near the railroad tracks, you will find that the direct emissions of the train do not affect the environment, on the contrary, the surrounding vegetation grows luxuriantly; Although aquatic organisms will play a role in water purification, salt and aquatic products will also be affected to a certain extent.