Do hotels and restaurants mean the same thing?

Compared with restaurants, hotels focus on business and profits, while restaurants focus on public services, and restaurants sound more advanced, and hotels are similar to restaurants or something. But restaurants generally have a considerable scale, to a certain extent.

In the student sentences you said, I feel the same with any word I use. The restaurant is even better.

Personally, I think that hotels include restaurants but restaurants do not include hotels, compared with restaurants, hotels focus on business and profits, while restaurants focus on public services

The meaning of "restaurant" is not the same as "restaurant" and "cafeteria", and "restaurant" is more of a large room for eating, but the literal meaning is the same. And in this sentence, the restaurant will be more accurate!

Compared to restaurants, hotels focus on business and profit, while restaurants focus on public services.

In fact, many times the two are vaguely understood, as long as everyone can understand it. Of course, under normal circumstances, a hotel is a more comprehensive place, generally including guest rooms, meeting rooms, restaurants, etc., but a restaurant is a place to eat. The canteen is also a place to eat, more often to solve the problem of internal staff eating.

A restaurant should be a place to eat.

A hotel should be a place that includes hotels and other services.

A restaurant is a place to eat, and a hotel is a large hotel that includes a series of services such as accommodation and meals.

Canteens are generally used to refer to places where meals are eaten in public places such as hospitals and schools.

Also, it's better to use the signature dish in this sentence!

First of all, canteens and restaurants must be different, but if restaurants and restaurants are subdivided, there are still differences in scale and form.

Personally, I think the two are not the same.

The restaurant is the place to eat.

The restaurant is similar to a hotel, and the canteen should be a large company or school. . .

There is still a difference between the three.

The restaurant is just a place to eat, and the hotel can include catering, accommodation, and bathing, which is relatively rich. As for the canteen, it refers to the place where food and drink are provided for certain groups.

Dizzy, what's the difference? Non-professionals, usually used to use the same meaning. It doesn't feel awkward at all.

First of all, there are certain differences between "hotel" and "restaurant" in terms of scale, form, specifications, etc., and whether it is suitable also depends on what kind of context it is used in. Personally, I think words like "specialty dish, signature dish" are more appropriate for restaurants.

Personally, I think that hotels include restaurants, but restaurants do not include restaurants.

Restaurants focus on business and profit, while restaurants focus on public services. There is no right or wrong, only suitable and inappropriate.

The hotel includes a restaurant, but the restaurant does not include a hotel.

Hotels: food and accommodation or others;

Restaurant: Meals only.

It's all a place to eat, but it still sounds different.

There is no right or wrong, only suitable and inappropriate.