What is the fundamental reason why Ming and Qing furniture is different from the Baroque style?

Before this concept, let's distinguish between two concepts:

Ming-style furniture and Qing-style furniture, in short, Ming-style furniture is simple and generous, mainly in shape and line, Qing-style furniture is complex and fine, and is good at decoration, and the style of Ming-style furniture and Baroque style are basically not touched, and Qing-style furniture is somewhat affected by it.

In fact, the baroque pattern still appears on the Qing style furniture, but in general, the context of a nation's development is always inherited in an orderly manner, and the furniture is developed on the basis of the previous one in terms of craftsmanship and decoration, and it is basically possible to sort out the context, despite the impact of the political change of the Qing Dynasty on furniture manufacturing, and the emergence of diversified national styles, but whether from the structure or decoration, the traditional tradition is still more or less inherited.

The fundamental reason for the Ming and Qing Dynasty furniture and the Baroque style lies in the aesthetic difference, and the characteristics of Chinese arts and crafts are the folk naïve, the court is serious and fine, but there are always etiquette constraints, which is the accumulation of culture, which is difficult to change. Therefore, the furniture of the Ming and Qing dynasties until the end of the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, the strong impact of foreign culture, the form of internal and external troubles, more reflected the influence of the Baroque style. But no matter how it is explained, the furniture cannot take off the cloak of etiquette and humility, which is incompatible with the cynical and prosperous ideas of the Baroque.

Your question is too awkward, throughout the history of Chinese culture and furniture, one or two sentences I can't understand.

Ming-style furniture and Qing-style furniture, in short, Ming-style furniture is simple and generous, mainly in shape and line, Qing-style furniture is complex and fine, and is good at decoration, and the style of Ming-style furniture and Baroque style are basically not touched, and Qing-style furniture is somewhat affected by it.

In fact, the baroque pattern still appears on the Qing style furniture, but in general, the context of a nation's development is always inherited in an orderly manner, and the furniture is developed on the basis of the previous one in terms of craftsmanship and decoration, and it is basically possible to sort out the context, despite the impact of the political change of the Qing Dynasty on furniture manufacturing, and the emergence of diversified national styles, but whether from the structure or decoration, the traditional tradition is still more or less inherited.

The fundamental reason for the Ming and Qing Dynasty furniture and the Baroque style lies in the aesthetic difference, and the characteristics of Chinese arts and crafts are the folk naïve, the court is serious and fine, but there are always etiquette constraints, which is the accumulation of culture, which is difficult to change. Therefore, the furniture of the Ming and Qing dynasties until the end of the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, the strong impact of foreign culture, the form of internal and external troubles, more reflected the influence of the Baroque style. But no matter how it is explained, the furniture cannot take off the cloak of etiquette and humility, which is incompatible with the cynical and prosperous ideas of the Baroque.

Different national personalities and different cultural backgrounds. The Chinese are not as extreme as the Europeans, either solemn or romantic and passionate. The Chinese are more particular about the golden mean.

Different philosophical roots and differences in aesthetic ideas and cultural connotations.