-
1) Sue the homeowner because the owner of the house should provide a well-equipped home for others to use. 2) The tenant is added as a third party because improper use of the facility may result in (flooding). So, you can sue the landlord and add the tenant as a third party.
In this way, they can protect their legitimate rights and interests to the greatest extent, and as for the lessor or tenant of the house, who is more responsible, it will be resolved in a separate case between them.
-
Of course, it's the landlord, but it's a trivial matter, there is no need to sue, just negotiate with the landlord to settle it.
-
Homeowners should be sued. Because the house belongs to the owner. The bathroom soaked in water, it must have been when the house was renovated, the bathroom was not waterproof, or the waterproof was not done well.
You ask her to contact your landlord, and don't say if you have the right to make changes, otherwise you will have to pay for the construction.
It's a simple question. Since you asked this question, it proves that your house is not due yet, and the landlord has money on it. And it won't be returned. >>>More
Whether he tells you or not, the maintenance of the house is the responsibility of the landlord.
The landlord needs to come forward to negotiate with the downstairs to deal with it. >>>More
Yes, if the leak is bigger, it will flood the households below, because the households below are flooded, and tens of thousands of hundreds of thousands of compensation are often generated.