What do you think of Yang Liping s lawsuit against the restaurant for infringing on her peacock danc

I think Yang Liping is a very good dancer, and the peacock dance has indeed become a symbol for her, and for the peacock dance she created herself, she must have applied for protection, and it must be illegal for others to use this without her permission, so she is a normal phenomenon to protect her rights.

I think she's right to do that. Yang Liping has dedicated her life to dance and has high attainments. The fact that a restaurant rehearsed her peacock dance without her permission was an infringement, and her appeal was legal, valid, and in accordance with the regular legal procedures.

Yang Liping can be said to have devoted her life to the peacock dance and paid a lot, whether it was in her own life or in her own body. When people think of the peacock dance, they will think of Yang Liping, which has played a great positive role in the spread of the peacock dance. However, if the restaurant is only edited, it is very similar to the peacock dance, and it is not said that it is the peacock dance, nor does it use Yang Liping's portrait name, which is not an infringement.

I feel that it is the right thing to do, and it is the right way to protect my own rights and interests.

In fact, there are many similar examples in our lives, and the state also advocates the protection of intellectual property rights. Nowadays, people's concept of intellectual property rights is also deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and infringement must be curbed, so as to better promote the progress and development of society, and I believe that more people will choose to support it.

These acts were in fact a free ride on the social popularity and reputation of Yang Liping, who is the cultural business card of Yunnan, and the works involved in the case, causing the relevant public to mistakenly believe that the Shichahai Branch, a restaurant operated by the three defendants, had a specific connection with Yang Liping, such as commercial alliances and advertising endorsements, and caused the relevant consumers to misunderstand the relationship between the three defendants' "Yunhai Cuisine Yunnan Cuisine" restaurant Shichahai Store and Yang Liping, and then enabled the three defendants to gain a competitive advantage, which was obviously an act of unfair competition.

I think this is a very normal opinion thing, and there is nothing to criticize, because my dance work itself is a personal work, patented. In this way, copying someone else's dance work without the permission of others is already an infringement.

Yang Liping has devoted her life to the Peacock Dance, and her feelings are still understandable when she sees the silhouettes of her painstaking works being copied into restaurant decorations. However, the restaurant did not use Yang Liping's name and face, and claimed 1 million just because the silhouette was similar, which seems to be not as convincing as the "certainty" of infringement of portrait rights.

I feel that this is an act that deserves to be appreciated and promoted. Because in this way, the protection of our intellectual property rights is still very good.

In today's society, plagiarism and other infringement incidents continue to occur, but many people choose to remain silent, which also indirectly promotes this behavior. Such behavior is not only disrespectful to the original work, but also illegal.

I think that through Yang Liping's practice, we can call on everyone to work together to protect intellectual property rights.

The peacock dance is not Yang Liping's patent, nor was it invented by her.

You're already a celebrity, don't care if people give you a spoonful!