Can I use Creo for furniture design? How is it different from using UG?

Creo is parametric modeling software. You draw a single TV cabinet may not be obvious. If you want to use Creo to paint the whole house solid wood whole. Think for yourself how many orders there will be!

UG can remove model parameters and modify them with synchronous process commands. A model space has only entities and no parameters. This saves a lot of space on your computer!

Subsequent versions of Pro E windfire have been renamed Creo Parametric, and UG is now commonly referred to as UG NX

Both soft buildings have a certain understanding,First of all, I threw out my opinion:

On the CAD side, I haven't used either of them in depth in the latest version. In the previous version, the parametric design was not as good as Creo Parametric, but Creo Parametric was inferior in non-parametric aspects, and both had their own strengths.

In CAM, NX beats Creo. Both started with CAM, but obviously there is no CAM market for Creo now, although Creo still has NC modules, but it has become a virtual reality, and I have personally used Creo's five-axis programming function, which is called a difficult to use. On the contrary, NX's CAM market is still quite large, but in recent years, it has been overtaken by Powermill and Cimatron.

In terms of CAE, NX Nastran is slightly better, and the official promotion of Creo simulate is "analysis software for designers", which translates to "We are not too professional in this area, and it is okay to analyze it a little, not for professional analysis work."

Now they all use creo. The mold design is UG, Creo is proe, and the 3D modeling and machinery are smoother than other software. Although SW is mainly focused on machinery, it has a 100% chance of error when opening large assemblies.

And it's not smooth, let alone top-down assembly, which can get you stuck running complex and large assemblies that can't do it with an 8-core computer. Creo is fine, of course there is a lag. UG is even more not.

That's all I know.

That's what I use Creo to design furniture. Select the furniture components and assemble them into furniture by assembling them. It is very quick and convenient to change.

The size production of furniture must have a parameter BOM list directly to the production department. Forget about UG, parameterization is far from Creo. It's okay to draw some furniture drawings to see what's okay.

It would be a bit overwhelming to say that the discharge material was sent to the production department. The UG programming is stronger than Creo's when it is processed, and the surface is like this because there are few people using Creo's NC module. HOWEVER, UG PROGRAMMING IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF CIMATRON AND POWERMILL.

I feel that UG is the kind that does everything in every way, but it can't do it well. Another is that computers are demanding. Is it to buy hardware for hardware factories???

Personally, I think UG is relatively large, after all, the number of users is there, and UG's drawing function is very powerful.

Creo is parametric modeling software. You draw a single TV cabinet may not be obvious. If you want to use Creo to paint the whole house solid wood whole. Send your own return to the Imperial Palace, and think about how many orders there will be!

UG can remove model parameters and modify them by synchronous modeling commands. A model space has only entities and no parameters. This saves a lot of space on your computer!