In the tort liability law, he is not at fault, for example, the flower pot on his balcony fell and i

The current Tort Liability Law stipulates that the liability for damage caused by the falling off or fall of buildings and other facilities is presumed. As long as they cannot prove that they are not at fault, they will be liable for compensation.

Fault here refers to the incomplete and incomplete state of the maintenance and management of the property by the manager or owner, so as to lack the security that it should have.

If the pot is placed on the balcony without any secure fastening, it is generally considered a fault to fall due to wind or rain. If someone else has made a mistake, you can recover from the other party.

Unless it is an earthquake, this is a force majeure.

You can't just be held accountable just because you're at fault.

You give an example, a flower pot falls and hurts people, and the flower pot is all you have, you are all of you. And in their own homes. Then the flower pot falls and hurts people, you must not be able to get out of the relationship.

I believe that the principle of no-fault liability is applied at this time. Considering the rights and interests of the victim, for no reason, the probability of the fixed flower pot falling and smashing people should be...

Wind blowing or other natural causes, if you implement a fixed action so that it does not fall, then you are not at fault.

In addition, the current Tort Liability Law provides for the presumption of fault for damage caused by the falling off or fall of buildings and other facilities. Unless you prove that you are not at fault, you will be held responsible.