Why the capitalist state is warlike and has to do with the nature of the state

The state is a product of private property, but private property does not always produce war, and the problem with capitalism is that it always sees only its own private property and denies the private property of others.

Specifically, capitalism in the early stage of its development, that is, the stage of primitive accumulation of capital, needs to rely on colonial expansion and plunder, to obtain a large amount of capital, raw materials and markets, Marx famously said that "capital has been dripping with blood and dirty things from head to toe since it came into the world".

Later, with the continuous development and growth of capitalism, especially the emergence of the industrial revolution, the level of productive forces has increased greatly, in order to maintain the rapid development of its economy, they urgently need a larger commodity sales market, more raw materials, so once again extend the tentacles of aggression to all parts of the world, different from the initial stage, in the means no longer mainly rely on direct robbery, but use commodities as a weapon to open the door to other countries;

In the sixties and seventies of the nineteenth century, the second industrial revolution began, the level of productivity was raised to an unprecedented height, so the demand for markets and raw materials became more urgent. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the world was basically carved up, and the capitalist world colonial system was established.

In addition, it is worth noting that while the capitalist countries invade and expand in different ways, there will also be many contradictions and conflicts between each other, which will further aggravate the turmoil in the world.

Based on this, some scholars have pointed out that capitalism itself is "aggressive" and "warlike".

Humans have been fighting wars since the ape stage, how can this have anything to do with the nature of the country? Species have been found all over the world, and the landlord asks you to find me an animal that doesn't fight.

From small fights to wars, these are the basic ways in which nature selects excellent genes. The most basic rule of the animal world is that those who win the fight obtain the right to mate and reproduce, and the same is true for humans, and the strong continue their genes. If one day human beings no longer have spines, no more muscles, no more cells, and human beings are completely separated from animals, then I believe that human beings will not go to war.

In the past, the Soviet Union and Vietnam were still socialist countries, and they did not start wars, no matter what the reasons were made, wars are wars after all, and throughout the ages, the banner of any war is the same: either "saving the world" or "upholding justice".

Yes, because the economic system of capitalist countries is private ownership, many shareholders of weapons and equipment companies have economic support to enter the Congress, and they can only expand the consumption of weapons and equipment and make money by supporting or provoking wars. Some resource monopolies also have members in Congress, and they can only reap foreign interests by provoking wars.

He often fights, is physically strong, feeds his wars with war, and sweeps around.