Which is more cost effective to burn electricity or bio oil in restaurants?

Updated on Restaurant 2024-08-29
1 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Biomass burning must be much more convertible, because coal is more polluting, and biomass is clean and cheap.

Related questions
3 answers2024-08-29

Natural gas is definitely good, after all, the stove technology has been mature and safe and reliable for so many years, and bio-oil has not been tested for enough time, and the cost is higher than natural gas.

1 answers2024-08-29

There really isn't much to know about bio-oil, the calorific value and whether it produces harmful gases. Natural gas and coal gas should be the most used gas in households now, natural gas is non-toxic, high calorific value, should be the best choice, but the price is higher than gas, the calorific value of gas is not as high as natural gas, and carbon monoxide, so pay attention to ventilation, beware of gas poisoning. Both gases should be used safely, as they can cause an explosion!

1 answers2024-08-29

The same amount of capital investment must be teppanyaki How many ordinary people will eat Western food, Western food is highly profitable but also high in investment. For the same area, the investment in Western food is more than double that of teppanyaki.

1 answers2024-08-29

Liquefied gas is better, but it needs to be equipped with a set of transmission and distribution system, which has low cost, less pollution and easy to use. At present, there is a special energy-saving engineering company to do the transmission and distribution system. >>>More

3 answers2024-08-29

The cost of ethanol is not low, and the combustion potential is high, and it is currently used as a substitute for vehicle fuel, and it is not recommended as a civilian use, it is not safe, after all, it is a restaurant. >>>More