Case Zhang, who lives on the fourth floor, placed a pot of flowers on the balcony

Updated on Balcony 2024-07-07
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    1. The principle of presumption of fault shall be applied.

    Zhang is the owner and manager of the flower pot, and has the responsibility to manage the flower pot, and he should ensure that the flower pot does not harm others.

    In this case, Zhang was obviously negligent in the management of the flower pots, causing harm to others, and was at fault for the occurrence of this case. According to Article 126 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, unless Zhang can prove that he is not at fault, he needs to bear civil liability for compensation.

    Under the following circumstances, it may be determined that Zhang is not at fault:

    1) Due to force majeure, such as earthquakes, etc., the flower pot falls. However, falling due to wind blowing is not a force majeure, because blowing is a very common natural phenomenon, easy to foresee, and can be avoided.

    2) The fall of the pot was caused by the victim's own actions. Even if the flower pot is caused by a third party, Zhang must bear joint and several liability.

    2. Zhang should be compensated.

    In fact, this question is a continuation of the first one. Zhang is responsible for the fall of the flower pot, and of course needs to compensate the victim.

  2. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Here's the answer:

    1. According to Article 126 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, the principle of imputation of responsibility in this case is "presumption of fault". That is, the first version of the damage is considered to be the right of fault, but this kind of fault allows the actor to prove the overturn, which is the principle of presumption of fault.

    2. Zhang should be compensated: medical expenses, nursing expenses, hospital meal subsidies, transportation expenses, nutrition expenses, lost work expenses, and mental loss expenses; Disability benefits are also paid in case of disability.

  3. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Article 126 of the Civil Law: Where buildings or other facilities, as well as shelving or hanging objects on buildings, collapse, fall off, or fall, causing damage to others, their owners or managers shall bear civil liability, except where they can prove that they are not at fault.

    So Zhang should be compensated.

  4. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    The principle of fault liability should be compensated, Zhang knew that the wind was strong on this day, and he should take the flower pot into the house or take other preventive measures to cause the accident!

Related questions
2 answers2024-07-07

This depends on the size of the floor, the amount of furniture and the specific requirements of the owner. If you work about 8 hours a day, or clean once a day, then the charge must be different.

1 answers2024-07-07

There are definitely risks. Generally supervisors will not block. It's all blocked around the corner. There is no problem with normal use, but I am afraid of stuffing into "blockages".

1 answers2024-07-07

Halo, to get the drawings out, about fume treatment, two methods, one is to make a pipe to the roof of the building, save money and worry, and the other is to use a low-altitude emission fume purifier. >>>More

20 answers2024-07-07

The entire four-story building has running water, except for the washbasin in the bathroom on the third floor. It is clear that the problem is isolated and the most likely cause is a clogged inlet pipe or faucet there. Please close the valve in front of the water meter to stop the water for maintenance, dredge the blocked part, clean the faucet, and then standardize the installation, you can solve this problem.

1 answers2024-07-07

The impact was minimal, and a green plant in the window completely dissolved.