Were toilets really that hygienic in ancient Rome?

Updated on Toilets 2024-07-25
1 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Compared to today's sanitary conditions, the facilities of ancient Rome must have been like that. Let's say, at least they don't have toilet paper. In addition, the water supply system should not have been available, and the water supply at that time was supposed to be based on cisterns.

    However, the sewer system in the Roman period was quite complete and complex, and perhaps in addition to the elaborate interior decoration, only the sewers were more similar to those used today.

Related questions
1 answers2024-07-25

Public toilets in ancient Rome were very advanced and hygienic at the time, but they were more than 1,000 years ago

2 answers2024-07-25

Hello, the bathroom is generally dark and damp, which is easy to breed bacteria. >>>More

1 answers2024-07-25

The chefs in the restaurant are generally more or less professionally trained, 360 lines, and the line is knowledgeable. If a restaurant is worse than home-cooked food, who spends money? Of course, there is no doubt that home-cooked food is healthier and hygienic! >>>More

1 answers2024-07-25

It's a fact that everything online is cheap. But I'll tell you the cheap part of it. >>>More

2 answers2024-07-25

It's not all generalizable.

There are certainly some restaurants that try to make it easier for customers to use unsterilized paper, but I believe that most restaurants serve sterilized napkins. >>>More