Is it true that it is more comfortable to sit on a sofa than to sit on a chair?

The contact area between the sofa and the human body is larger than that of the wooden bench, so the pressure is small and it is comfortable to sit on.

LZ thought about it for a long time, and the result is as follows, everyone don't laugh...

If we define something that can exist on its own without the definition of a human being as natural, and vice versa, it is unnatural. Then, the classification of natural attributes cannot generate any necessary correspondence with the classification of non-natural attributes, and there can only be a statistically probable correspondence between the two. From this point of view, it is still a mistake to conclude that the sofa is comfortable to sit on and the chair is less comfortable, no matter how many people agree with this view.

Because not only everyone's definition of comfort is different, comfort itself is only a purely subjective concept, and although chairs and sofas are objective things, they still need to rely on human definitions to exist (otherwise a wooden chair is not used by anyone, it is just a pile of wood), and even everyone's definition of chair and sofa is not necessarily the same, so the classification of chairs and sofas is not a distinction of natural attributes. It is represented in a table as follows:

What you sit on Comfort sofa A level Chair B level (below A) ps, we can also see the judgment of high and low as a classification, but this classification has a directional order and cannot be reversed.

Even if all living people in the world agree that it is more comfortable to sit on a sofa than to sit on a chair, that is, the correspondence in the above table, it can only be said that there is a contingent correspondence with a statistical probability of 100% at this moment, and it cannot be said that there is an absolute inevitable correspondence.