Hello lawyer Cao, the landlord told my transferee when I transferred the restaurant that the contrac

1. From a legal point of view, after the expiration of the lease contract, the landlord has the right to choose to take it back and no longer rent it, and the landlord has not expressed his willingness to breach the contract, so this is not a fault and of course he is not liable.

2. The right of first refusal does not mean that the lease must be renewed, but that there is priority under the same conditions compared to other people who want to rent this house. If the landlord wants to reclaim for his own use, there is no priority. Or if someone else wants to rent for a higher price than you think, you don't have priority.

3. It depends on whether the lease contract is agreed. If there is an agreement, it will be handled according to the agreement. If there is no agreement, you should be compensated accordingly for the value of your renovation if the landlord wants to use it. If not, you are responsible for restitution.

4. If the use is not agreed in the contract, you can theoretically use it for all legally operated projects.

5. No, you can't. Whether or not to renew the contract after expiration is up to both parties and does not need to be specified.

6. This should not affect the validity of the contract.

7. In fact, if the landlord does not terminate the contract in advance, it is now unfavorable to you, it is recommended to try to communicate with the landlord to reach an understanding and solve the matter.

1. The landlord has the right not to renew the contract after the expiration of the contract, because your transfer is subject to the landlord's consent. Therefore, the landlord is not at fault for informing the landlord.

2. The right of first refusal is only enjoyed by you under the same conditions. If the landlord determines that the tenant will not repossess the rent, or if the rent of someone else is higher than your rent, the landlord has the right not to continue to rent the premises to you.

3. The decoration problem of the expiration of the contract has an agreement based on the agreement, and if there is no agreement, you can demolish it, and if the landlord clearly indicates that you need to use it, you will be given appropriate compensation.

4. Since there is no agreement on the business purpose, you can decide for yourself.

5. If the landlord does not inform you that you do not renew the contract when it expires, you do not need to be liable for compensation.

6. This change is okay because the landlord has approved it.

7. There is no fault in the landlord's notification, so there is no basis for you to claim compensation.

1. The landlord is not responsible, the sublease must be agreed by the landlord, you cannot sublet without authorization, the landlord only expresses the meaning of not renting when the contract expires. There are no obligations and responsibilities.

2. The right of priority is based on the same price.

3. No, if the landlord needs to restore the original state, you still have the obligation to restore the original state.

4. As long as you get a business license.

5. There is no basis.

6. It does not affect the effect, although only the landlord has signed, but the de facto contract has been formed.

7. The landlord is not in breach of contract, and it is best to negotiate a settlement.

Yes, that's right, it's really good, it's good.