If you want to buy Canon 500D, it s just a door to door level, and if you don t buy a set, you shoul

50D positioning is a mid-range machine,Focus system,Body workmanship,Grip feel, etc. are more "professional"Some 500D positioning is to enter the door,Convenient configuration in photography is good,But because of its positioning,So workmanship,Feel, etc. are slightly "amateurish" but in terms of image quality,The difference is not big,Both can be considered in pure photographyAnother 500D launched a little later,Add some new features,Such as 1080P HD camera,There is a certain "playability"--If the budget is limited, you can consider 500D set, The quality of the sleeve is average, but it is still good to shoot landscapes at a reduced aperture, and if it is cheap and affordable, you can consider having a cheap large-aperture lens like 50 for shooting portraits and sketches, and it can also effectively separate the subject and the background, and then you can consider it.

17-40/4L

4K5) cultural scenery can be taken into account.

Don't be too professional?

Buy a 500d

The set of machines on the line, save money, practice technology when the technology is good.

Then put on a good lens, such as a full set of red circles, and finally directly the full-frame body, with the red circles I bought before.

Such planning.

The fairest. Don't waste your money on some.

C-format lenses, it will be useless in full frame in the future, and the quality is not good. The 50D is a quasi-professional machine.

Much more expensive than 500d.

There is no need for the two of them to measure together, if they pursue the fuselage to do work, in the case of economic promise, it will be 50d. 500d

It's a plastic body, but if it's a plastic body, Nikon's plastic body is better than Canon's. You don't have to think too much about the fuselage, what's the use of metal, you're still afraid of falling. It's not a special environment to shoot. Let's get in the door first.

The 50D is a metal body.

But there is no need to buy 50D

It's all APS-c.

It's enough to buy a 500D.

The key is to practice your skills well.

Gain familiarity with the equipment.

Deepen your understanding of photography.

The ultimate goal is still to be on the whole deck.

Such as an invincible rabbit. Don't say you don't dare to think about it.

You know when you're poisoned.

Money is no longer money.

This equipment is not in place in one step, as far as the lens is concerned.

The 1855 is a good value for money lens.

But first of all, the performance is not high.

It's too ordinary. Sharpness and depth of field are incompatible.

The most practical thing is to spend a small amount of money to buy a 50

See the benefits of a wide aperture.

It's better than it's worth it.

I don't regret spending this money.

Pros: Cheap and good imaging.

Disadvantages: Fixed focus. Prices range from 600 to 700.