-
Anonymous users2024-01-24The responsibility of both parties, although the store posted a reminder in the store, but as the supervisor of the restaurant, it still did not fulfill its obligations, the supervision was not in place, and the parents of the other party's children did not take care of the children attentively, and there is also a part of the responsibility, as for the compensation, the two parties should negotiate.
If two friends have a water fight in kindergarten, the teacher should first pick and choose to educate the child and make the child realize his mistakes. The second is that parents should also educate their children at home on what to do at school.
According to Article 23 of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests, consumers can request a return or exchange of goods in question, and in this case, consumers can negotiate with the restaurant to either return the dish or change another dish, because this is caused by the restaurant's work error, and if the restaurant has committed fraud, the consumer can claim double the amount of compensation. >>>More
The most meaningful person is to keep smiling, not saying anything, and pretending not to know anything.
Someone infected when eating in a restaurant, don't you recognize the restaurant owner? It must be responsible for not being able to open a restaurant during the epidemic prevention period.
This restaurant is under no obligation to compensate. The current statutes and ordinances do not stipulate that customers have an obligation to compensate for the loss of things while eating in a restaurant. So there's no way for them to compensate. If the restaurant has surveillance, they are obligated to provide evidence of surveillance.