-
Anonymous users2024-01-23Maybe there's something wrong with it.
After all, the needs are different.
And I don't know it myself.
You are not where not to fit.
Maybe the new director likes the toilet more, maybe it's a fetish.
It is important to let farmers take the initiative to transform, stimulate the enthusiasm of farmers, and publicize the importance of sanitation.
The toilet has been renovated by itself, why does the village charge 300 yuan, is this reasonable? First of all, it is unreasonable to hear it, what is the cost of his 300 yuan? You can go to the local town and ask.
More than 1,000 yuan is not expensive, to buy things, labor costs, all need money, buy a basin to wash the face of the hundreds.
For this problem, under normal circumstances, this is a good policy, let farmers give toilets, and environmental protection has changed, but in the countryside, those things are discharged there, and the toilets are damaged in winter? It all comes to mind.