Liu purchased a set of oak sofas on the invoice from a furniture company, and half a year later, by

As the seller, Furniture Company A has experience in the difference between oak and rubberwood, and according to the provisions of the Consumer Rights Protection Law, if the seller sells fake goods, it should generally be determined as fraud, and cannot be identified as a major misunderstanding. Therefore, the conduct of Furniture Company A constituted an expression of intent to defraud. The contract entered into between Mr. Liu and Company A was a contract concluded because Mr. Liu fell into a misunderstanding, and the contract did not harm the interests of the state, so it was a contract that could be changed and revoked, and was not an invalid contract.

The injured person, Liu, may request the court to revoke or modify it.

1.Variation and revocable contract Company A is a company that specializes in the sale of furniture, so it can be inferred that it should have known that the furniture was not oak. However, if it is sold knowing that it is a counterfeit product, it can be determined that it is a "contract concluded by fraudulent means", which is a contract that can be changed or revoked.

Of course, even Company A is reluctant, and contracts with major misunderstandings and obvious unfairness are all contracts that can be changed and revoked.

2.Company B can be the defendant, and when the company merges, the creditor's rights and debts of the parties to the merger shall be inherited by the surviving company or the newly established company after the merger.

The price of rubberwood is definitely not enough to buy an oak sofa!!