The water pipe in the toilet of the company s workshop leaked for several months, and the company bo

It depends on how your company's responsibility for the area management of the toilet is divided, and the penalty should consider direct and indirect liability. In any case, the discoverer has the obligation to report to the person in charge or to the superior, and the superior will not know if he does not report. Judging from the only information you provided in this case, the cleaner must know that he has to clean every day, and he has the responsibility to report; The workshop director has to go to the toilet every day, and he should also know it.

Plumbing and water maintenance workers and personnel managers can only receive information about the damage to repair and solve, and if they do not receive any information, if there is a regulation and no regular inspection, they are also responsible, otherwise, they are not responsible, at most bear the responsibility for management negligence.

Therefore, first of all, we must figure out the division of management responsibilities, secondly, we must find out whether there is a report and do not solve it, and finally share the 20% loss according to the size of the responsibility, and after apportioning the loss, it is not too much to give a certain fine.

I think that the workshop director and the water and electricity maintenance worker should each bear 35%; Indirectly responsible persons.

The manager and cleaner each bear 15%. That makes sense.

There is nothing reasonable or unreasonable. The company also bears that much of the amount. It is reasonable to burden all these managers, are you right about the company's remuneration for you, they are all irresponsible employees, and the punishment should be as much as possible, with such employees, the company will go bankrupt, and it is not too much to fire a few directly responsible persons.

It's not like there's a saying, don't work hard today. Try to find a job tomorrow.