The mother in law trained her son to become a doctoral student, and asked her future daughter in law

I don't think it's particularly reliable to do this, and it will be very tiring before you enter the door, and there will be constant contradictions in the future.

I am afraid that this will leave a bad impression on the daughter-in-law's parents, and it may scare the daughter-in-law away, after all, the son's efforts to become a talent should be repaid by the son, and the daughter-in-law and the son's family will bear it together, but it does not mean that the daughter-in-law is here to be a cow and a horse, and only let the daughter-in-law pay the money, which hurts the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law.

This is unreasonable, how can there be a daughter-in-law before entering the door, and the son is not going to be a son-in-law, and the future pension still depends on the son and daughter-in-law, this mother's positioning is too high.

Mother-in-law's approach has been considered for a long time, can you cultivate a doctor's son, will you not be able to handle the relationship between your daughter-in-law, and get along with your daughter-in-law, your daughter-in-law is equivalent to your daughter, and you don't have to worry about pension expenses when you are old!

Because his son is excellent, the idea of letting his future daughter-in-law pay a pension first when he enters the door is very strange.

This is China, not India, and the status of men and women is relatively equal. Marriage is a mutual equal, and there is no such thing as a high or a low level.

Your son has been cultivated and talented, you have paid a lot, and other people's daughters have grown up, why not.

I think this method is particularly unreasonable, and the pension should also be paid by the son, not the daughter-in-law.

This pension should be paid by the son, and the daughter-in-law should be paid! So the daughter-in-law's mother raised her daughter so big and married to your family, she also needs a batch of pension expenses, if you really compete, unless you don't enter the door!

I'm afraid this is unreasonable, you are just raising your own son and daughter-in-law, it doesn't have much to do with it.

It feels too much, if the future daughter-in-law is not particularly rich, it is estimated that she will not come.

No matter how you say this pension, it is not the turn of the future daughter-in-law to pay, and the mother-in-law can say such a thing, obviously the son is very obedient.

If you want to marry into this kind of family, you must think about it before you do.

This is a bit unreasonable, is your son particularly powerful, having an education does not mean that he is capable, which may harm your son.

I don't think that's reasonable. The future daughter-in-law will spend her life with her son. If you do this, will it ruin your son's happiness?

Selling for money? Give ah, and then give the mother-in-law pension without discrimination, whose children are not born to raise, what happened to doctoral students, not people or what? Telling my mother-in-law that cultivating a doctor is not the only one, and it is more convincing to have the ability to train a leader.

This is a bit excessive, marrying a husband, a person who can be entrusted with a lifetime, if you think this is a transaction, then you don't deserve love.

You ask her to train another one for you to see, and if it works, immediately double the money for her, otherwise it means that it is not her credit.

Let his son pay a pension to his mother-in-law, hollow out the small family, and see how much his doctor's son can earn.

There is nothing wrong with the matter itself, but China is a person who is too sophisticated, and this way of dealing with it will deal with interpersonal relationships too stiffly, so that the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law will be difficult to get along with in the future.

It's just very unreasonable, he should be like his son to have a pension.

This practice is not very suitable, firstly because you are cultivating your son, secondly, you have not cultivated your daughter-in-law, and the daughter-in-law comes in to live with your son, although the children have the obligation to support the elderly, but if you say this, it will cause a contradiction to the relationship between the daughter-in-law, which is not conducive to the harmony of family relations, if the children are filial, even if you do not mention this requirement, they will be filial to you.

I think this request is a bit excessive, if it were me, I wouldn't be able to accept it, and I don't think it would be too easy to enter the door.

Whether the child can become a talent, in addition to the cultivation of adults, is also inseparable from their own efforts, as for whether the daughter-in-law should pay the pension before entering the door, it depends on the daughter-in-law's own views on this matter.